Don’t Tip

Why tip? People say that it gives the waiter an economic incentive to do his job better. Because of this incentive, the meal will get to the table faster and the experience is generally more enjoyable.

Makes sense, no?

A waitress who takes your food 10 meters from the bench to your table deserves a tip, yet a man who spent weeks dealing with clients and sorting out technical issues for a large engineering project doesn’t? If tipping is to reward hard work and good service, then the engineer has done a hell of a lot more of both than the waitress. Why don’t we tip doctors? Why don’t we tip the mailman, bus driver, and dry cleaner?

The answer is because it tipping is nothing more than a tradition. It’s so locked in as tradition, that instead of tipping existing as a form of authentic personal charity, many people will take out their cell phones to calculate exactly how much 14% of the bill is. People who are short on money still feel obligated to tip, because the waiter would be insulted if he wasn’t paid extra. Countries like England, Japan, and Australia have no custom of tipping. In Switzerland, tipping is expected, but not more than 1.5% of the bill. In some countries, offering a tip would be considered condescending or demeaning.

Tipping became standard when a few rich people started doing it. It spread throughout the upperclass as a “socially responsible” thing to do and made people feel good for helping out the poor. This idea turned into an etiquette (read: required rules of society). The middle class inevitably emulated the rich, and the poor inevitably emulated the middle class.

Some take the stance that you should tip to get waiters up to minimum wage—but before you do this, you have to ask yourself why they are paid below minimum wage. Employers are allowed to pay waiters below minimum wage because tips make up a significant percentage of their income.

By tipping waiters to get them up to minimum wage, you are perpetuating the very system you seek to defeat. The more that you tip, the further restaurant workers’ real wages will fall. All you’re doing is increasing the restaurant owners’ profits by eliminating one of his highest costs and throwing away good money. It’s the employer’s job to pay his employees for their services, not the customer’s.

Posted in Humanities | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Artificial Virginity Kit

The Chinese company Gigimo advertises its Artificial Hymen Virginity kit across the Arab world. The kit, which allows women to fake sexual purity on their wedding night, is the sort of product one might find in a novelty store or sex shop in America. But in Egypt, nuptial night virginity is deadly serious business. Women who buy the product may be nonvirgins afraid of discovery, or just brides looking for a little extra insurance that they’ll be able to fly the bloodstained sheet.

Lawmakers from Egypt’s conservative Muslim Brotherhood party have called for a ban on sales of the kit. Sheik Sayed Askar, a member of the party who serves on the parliament’s religious affairs committee, proclaims, “It will be a mark of shame on the ruling party if it allowed this product to enter the market.”

What a crazy idea. I’m glad I don’t live in Egypt. I wouldn’t fit in at all.

Lineage: The Wilson Quarterly, probably Winter 2009 issue.

Posted in Humanities, Informational | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Reversing Aging

a Howard Hughes Medical Institute team has found that through exposure to “young” blood cells, bone marrow stem cells start to act young again as well. “The researchers have not yet isolated the blood-borne factors that can switch old stem cells back to a more youthful state, but their results are consistent with other recent studies that show stem-cell aging may be reversible.1

Aging!

REVERSIBLE?

  1. http://www.hhmi.org/news/wagers20100128.html []
Posted in Informational, Science | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

X-Prize: Osama Bin Laden

In 2004 aerospace designer Burt Rutan and financier Paul Allen led the first private team to build and launch a spacecraft capable of carrying three people to 100 kilometers above the Earth twice within two weeks. They were racing against 26 other teams to win the $10 million X-Prize and to achieve international fame and glorious business prospects.1

What should have happened in 2001 is someone should have offered $10 million dollars for Osama bin Laden taken in alive and lesser amounts for lower ranking officers dead or alive. That would have taken care of anybody’s problem. If humanity can offer $10 million cash to go to space and back twice in a two week period, they can find one person in Afghanistan.

  1. http://space.xprize.org/ansari-x-prize []
Posted in Humanities, Original | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Spam Will Herald In A New Age

According to New Scientist, A team of computer scientists from the International Computer Science Institute in Berkeley, CA are claiming to have found an “effectively perfect” method for blocking spam.

“The system… works by exploiting a trick that spammers use to defeat email filters. As spam is churned out, subtle changes are typically incorporated into the messages to confound spam filters. Each message is generated from a template that specifies the message content and how it should be varied. The team reasoned that analyzing such messages could reveal the template that created them. And since the spam template describes the entire range of the emails a bot will send, possessing it might provide a watertight method of blocking spam from that bot.”

Sure, it will work “perfectly” for about 2 days, until the spam-hackers change their methods to work around it. This is an arms race; there is no “final solution.”

…Or is there?

Spam is a massively profitable industry, and spam prevention is not. This incentivizes some of the smartest people on the planet to create new technologies. Innovation is always good, even if its in something annoying, because eventually everyone will reap the benefits.

We keep pushing the requirements for spam further and further up the computational totem pole and you get closer and closer to a point where hackers are going to have to create strong AI to write spam. If they fail (they don’t), we don’t have spammers anymore and if they win, well we have spam, but we also have strong AI! It’s a win-win.

Strong AI

But if individual rights aren’t related to human genetics, but rather to an organisms sapience, allowing spam-hackers to create beings who should be treated as citizens but are actually used as slave labor is wrong.

By the time that happens, whoever makes the real breakthrough will probably feel very emotionally close to his creation, and would its not telling what would happen then. What would he program it to do? What would the bot program itself to do?

Killing these new type of viruses won’t be any different than the biological life we are familiar with. You block lines of communication between essential elements, or infect the bot itself with another virus. In the future, we’d even learn to encompass these sapient programs or virii to carry out specific tasks… perhaps to block spam.

Lineage: Slashdot <- NewScientist

Posted in Informational, Philosophy, Science | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Typical Ursula.

Miracle Jones blogs about the petition against the Google Book Settlement created by science fiction writer Ursula Le Guin, winner of five Hugo awards and six Nebulas. Leguin is urging professional writers who are opposed to the terms of the settlement to sign her online petition before the January 28th deadline. From the petition: “The free and open dissemination of information and of literature, as it exists in our Public Libraries, can and should exist in the electronic media. All authors hope for that. But we cannot have free and open dissemination of information and literature unless the use of written material continues to be controlled by those who write it or own legitimate right in it. We urge our government and our courts to allow no corporation to circumvent copyright law or dictate the terms of that control.”

What nonsense. “We urge the government and our courts to allow no corporation to… dictate the terms of that control”? That’s practically the definition of copyright law: allowing corporations to dictate the terms of control.

“We cannot have free and open dissemination of information… without control.” Typical. We cannot be free unless someone is controlling that freedom. What a nonsense, backwards idea of freedom.

Posted in Humanities, Original | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Literature Publishing of the Future

I forsee the publishing house of the future offering, for instance, a poet’s latest work in multiple formats simultaneously, each at a different price: an e-text version with links to all current reviews, related scholarly and popular comment, and bundled with its own discussion forum that links owners of each of the books; a hard-copy text, produced and delivered to one’s home as a single print-on-demand traditional book (with cheap and pricey paper and binding-quality options to choose among); a limited-edition fine press hand-printed copy in a leather binding, signed by the poet; or a video and audio of the poet reading the text. It will be revolutionary to have these choices available from one source, and the question this proposes is: which is the real text? Which is the original authoritative version?

However, the question is not that interesting. There is no “real”, “original”, or “authoritative” version. They are all authentic to the poet.

Along with this forseen move toward the multiplicity of choices, there will also be a multiplicity of publishing houses. The literary publishing market will grow increasingly decentralized. Because of the internet, even the smallest publishing company would have the same distributive capacity as the greatest, and this creates a fertile ground for great diversity and possibly a widespread return to folk.

Lineage: Wilson Quarterly, Winter 2010, letters to the editor.

Posted in Humanities | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

The Ultimate Prank: TSA Voyerism

Oh la la.

Who are we pranking today? Just the entire US Federal Government and all American citizens!

CNN is reporting on findings from a Freedom of Information request initiated by the Electronic Privacy Information Center that has revealed that, contrary to public statements by the Transportation Security Agency, full-body scanners can store and transmit images. The scanners can only transmit images when in “test mode.”1

You know what the ultimate prank would be? To hack into the scanners, copy all the nude images of passengers and start a subscription porn site hosted in Malaysia. Make a people search functionality where you can enter a name and it will show you their image. Nude X-rays of celebrities and foreign dignitaries can be seen advertised on the home page.

Now THAT’s trollin’ the US Govt.

  1. CNN: [HTML] []
Posted in Original | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Mann Crosses the Line

Roger Weiner was arrested at a Mississippi gas station for violating the Mann Act, an arcane law prohibiting transport of women across state lines for “immoral purposes.” This is stupid. It should be repealed. “Immoral purposes?” Who decides what is immoral? If you think rape, murder, and slavery are immoral, then we’ve already got laws that take care of that. However, Weiner appears to have been arrested for using the Internet to meet women.

FBI agents claim to have received a tip that Weiner was downloading child pornography from a website called sugardaddyforme.com.

When the child porn tip didn’t pan out, agents spent hours posing as prostitutes (was that part of your job requirement, officer?) in chat rooms, attempting to get Weiner to agree to pay them to make an 80-mile trip from Memphis to his home in Clarksdale, Mississippi. Weiner refused, at one point stating flatly that there’s “a difference between a sugar baby and a hooker, and I’m not interested in a hooker.”

One agent posting as “Mary” claimed to be in Memphis and repeatedly offered to drive to see Weiner for a sex-for-pay rendezvous. Weiner again refused. After several attempts, Mary told Weiner she was driving to Mobile, Alabama, would be passing through Clarksdale, and suggested they get together. Weiner finally agreed. At the last minute, Mary called to say she had no intention of going to Mobile and was actually coming solely to see Weiner— a requirement to trigger the Mann Act. When Weiner drove to the gas station to meet her, he was ambushed by a team of FBI agents.

In August, U.S. District Judge Neal Biggers nearly threw out the charges against Weiner. The records showed that Mary was never actually in Memphis; she had been propositioning Weiner from Mississippi and thus never crossed state lines. Biggers questioned the zeal with which federal agents tried to induce Weiner to commit a federal crime, saying, “You’ve come a long way from the purpose of this statute.”

At this time, the government still plans to try Weiner.

Lineage: Reason

Posted in Informational | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Incinerate Rabbits for Fuel

The city of Stockholm enlists fluffle1 cullers and carrion contractors to warm the homes of its citizens.

“[Rabbits] are a very big problem,” said Tuvunger. The rabbits are eating their way through the city’s central parks. “Once culled, the rabbits are frozen and when we have enough; a contractor comes and takes them away.”2

It’s normal in Sweden for animal carcasses to be processed for bio-fuel. Rabbits are shot on sight and the frozen carcasses are shipped to a plant in central Sweden to be incinerated for power.

“Those who support the culling of rabbits surely think it’s good to use the bodies for a good cause. But it feels like they’re trying to turn the animals into an industry rather than look at the main problem,” Anna Johannesson of the society told Vårt Kungsholmen newspaper, news Web site The Local reported.

Curiously, Johannesson points to slowly starving the rabbits3 instead of shooting them as a more humane way of going about the problem. The logic is not valid either. Even though she seemingly clearly gets around the idea of directly killing rabbits, she is still killing the rabbits by proxy of fraud, deceiving them into thinking their own food is not food, leading them to starvation.

Lineage: ABC News

  1. A group of rabbits is called a “fluffle.” []
  2. “Bunnies for Biofuel: How Sweden Heats its Homes”, published by Speigel Online through ABC News. [HTML] []
  3. “Johannesson said there other methods of getting rid of rabbits besides killing them, such as spraying park plants with a chemical that makes them unappetizing to rabbits.” [HTML] []
Posted in Humanities, Informational, Science | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Urban Vertical Farming

Dickson Dispommier, a Columbia University professor and visionary champion of vertical farming, claims that a 30-story glass skyscraper using nonsoil farming could produce enough food on a single city block to feed 50,000 people. But his farm would cost $200 million to build. Other seers are promoting more modest vertical schemes, such as Sky Vegetables, which would use grocery store rooftops—for example the four acres atop a typical Wal-Mart superstore.1


Lineage: YouTube, YouTube

  1. “Farming for Real”, published by the Wilson Quarterly, sourced from “Spoiled: Organic and Local Is So 2008″, by Paul Roberts, in Mother Jones, March-April 2009. []
Posted in Humanities | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Stop Working in the Private Sector

From a new Cato Institute report on “Employee Compensation in State and Local Governments“:

The study’s author, Chris Edwards, found that the wage premium for public sector employees was about 34 percent and for benefits about 70 percent.

Lineage: Reason <- Cato

Posted in Humanities, Informational | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Kalashnikovs

Ever since the Kalashnikov’s introduction in the Soviet Union in 1947 it has been a favorite due to its simple design. Of between 90 and 122 million assault rifles estimated to have been produced since World War II, between 70 and 100 million were Kalashnikovs. Together, these small arms have been responsible for more civilian deaths than air attacks or gas chambers. Nuclear weapons, it was once thought, would transform warfare, but they were economically dubious from the start. If the $2 billion spent building the Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombs had been used for conventional weaponry, the war might have ended sooner.

Pacman

Production ratio since WWII of assault rifles. Kalashnikovs in red, other types in yellow.

Lineage: “A Place for Hype”, by Edward Tenner, published May 2007 as book review of The Shock of the Old: Technology and Global History since 1900, by David Edgerton. [PDF]

Posted in Humanities | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Bring Back Slavery: Save Homeless People

Washington DC has passed a 5 cent tax on all plastic bags. This is stupid.

Instead of bags, Americans should employ homeless people to carry about their things. Such homeless people could be bought and sold like a commodity, provided that they who so use the homeless provide food and shelter. In this way, the cities will be cleaner, safer, and everyone will be happier.

Slavery wasn’t such a bad thing. It was only enslaving black people that was the objectionable.

It’s Constitutional too. The 13th Amendment doesn’t ban slavery. Not if you convict those to be enslaved first:

Section 1. Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.

Section 2. Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.

Vagrancy, or not being able to prove you had a job, has been illegal at many times and places in the United States and is still enforced today. According to the FBI database, in 2005, 24,359 people were arrested for vagrancy in the United States.1

So, you make vagrancy a crime punishable by one year of involuntary servitude to a licensed master. Not unconstitutional, and the old school whip-and-chains methods won’t be tolerated.

My new “National Living Standards Act of 2010″ bill is now in the works. I just need some Congressional sponsors (Ron Paul, anyone?) and we’ve got a deal.

  1. “Crime in the United States 2005″, published by the FBI. [HTML] []
Posted in Humanities | Tagged | Leave a comment

Osama bin Laden Not Involved in 9/11 Attacks

Is it possible that Osama bin Laden was not involved in the 9/11 attacks on the World Trade Center? It is curious that Osama bin Laden initially denied involvement.

World Trade Center towers burning on September 11, 2001

From CNN, dated September 17, 2001:

In a statement issued to the Arabic satellite channel Al Jazeera, based in Qatar, bin Laden said, “The U.S. government has consistently blamed me for being behind every occasion its enemies attack it.

“I would like to assure the world that I did not plan the recent attacks, which seems to have been planned by people for personal reasons,” bin Laden’s statement said.1

From Fox News, dated September 16, 2001:

Bin Laden has denied any connection to the attacks, though he has praised them. On Sunday, he reiterated his denial in a statement read by Qatar’s al-Jazeera satellite television channel.2

Despite multiple indictments and multiple requests for extradition by the United States, the Taliban refused to extradite Osama bin Laden until after the bombing of Afghanistan began in October 2001. The Taliban offered to turn over Osama bin Laden to a third-party country for trial, in return for the US ending the bombing and providing evidence that Osama bin Laden was involved in the 9/11 attacks. This offer was rejected by George W. Bush stating, “There’s no need to discuss innocence or guilt. We know he’s guilty.”3

Why would Bush so fervently reject an apparently peaceful proposal, where both sides would get what they want? I understand that I am looking at the situation with hindsight, seeing that Bush’s administration would have gone over much better if Osama bin Laden was captured, the Afghan invasion was declared a true success, and most parties were left happy with the American-NATO military action. But if Bush was really given this chance to get the man responsible for the attacks, why not just provide the unflappable evidence, receive bin Laden, and end the invasion? Instead, “The U.S. rejected this offer as an insufficient public relations ploy.”4

Why not make that wall of insurmountable evidence that justifies the beginning of an international manhunt and a War on Terror public? The US’s and UK’s intelligence agencies both came to the same conclusion, so the evidence should be good.

Osama's 2004 tape

Osama's admits in 2004

It was not until late October 2004 that Osama bin Laden claimed responsibility for the World Trade Center attacks. No one can be sure why it took three years. One might say it was simply lack of courage to face the force of the most powerful army in the world, but was it that same lack of courage that drove him to plan, finance, and carry out the World Trade Center, Pentagon, and Shanksville (Flight 93) attacks on September 11, 2001? Perhaps Osama bin Laden did not want to become a figurehead for Al-Qaeda. There was already a hunt for his head, so if he was captured and killed this would bring humiliation to his group. I do not know his ideas regarding these matters, but considering the possibility that evidence is not available to the common citizen proving Osama bin Laden’s guilt, and the fact that he denied allegations for three years, it would sure be interesting if Osama bin Laden was never actually involved.

  1. “Bin Laden says he wasn’t behind attacks”, published by CNN [HTML] []
  2. “Pakistan to Demand Taliban Give Up Bin Laden as Iran Seals Afghan Border”, by Carl Cameron, Marla Lehner, Paul Wagenseil and the Associated Press, published by Fox News. [HTML] []
  3. “Bush rejects Taliban offer to hand Bin Laden over”, published by The Guardian. [HTML] []
  4. Quoting Wikipedia’s Taliban article, “The stated intent of military operations was to remove the Taliban from power because of the Taliban’s refusal to hand over Osama bin Laden for his alleged involvement in the 11 September attacks, and disrupt the use of Afghanistan as a terrorist base of operations. On 14 October the Taliban offered to discuss handing over Osama bin Laden to a neutral country if the US halted bombing, but only if the Taliban were given evidence of Bin Laden’s involvement in 9/11. The U.S. rejected this offer as an insufficient public relations ploy and continued military operations.” []
Posted in Humanities | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The Dangerous Kit

“The Dangerous Kit” teaches kids at a young age not to be afraid of the world around them and to be critical thinkers by providing hands-on experience with items at different times in culture have been seen as shockingly dangerous when the true scale of their deleterious effects is between zilch and inane. A booklet is included with supplementary information. Included items are:

  • Mercury… to play with like your parents did!
  • Dose of DDT… to drink or bathe in!
  • Chunks of uranium… rub it on your face! Don’t worry! It’s safe!
  • Potato chips… will cause obesity! [WARNING: CONTAINS TRANS-FATS]
  • Stairway to Heaven… a song which will corrupt your mind using subliminal antisemitic messages!
  • Maoist propaganda… for distribution on Halloween!
  • All-in-One Jenkem kit… fool the media and police!

Coming soon, to a store near you!

Posted in Humanities | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Thorium, Blood of Civilization

When the choices for developing nuclear energy were being made, uranium was chosen because it had the byproduct of producing plutonium that could be weaponized. But thorium is safer, easier to work with, and gads more efficient. The plants are smaller, use a hundred times less fuel by mass, and the operating costs are much less.

It’s abundant— the US has at least 175,000 tons of thorium (each reactor is estimated to expend about 1 ton per year) and it doesn’t require costly processing. It is extraordinarily efficient as a nuclear fuel. As it decays in a reactor core, its byproducts produce more neutrons per collision than conventional fuels. The more neutrons per collision, the more energy generated, the less total fuel consumed, and the less waste product. You can also use thorium in entirely new kinds of reactors, that have a geographical footprint a thousand times smaller and have no risk of meltdown.

Emissions from power generation equals zero, and thorium is everywhere (it’s even in your dirt). Thorium plants are proliferation resistant (cannot produce fuel for nuclear weapons) and are considered fourth generation reactors. Thorium may be the blood of civilization in the 2040s.

Inspired by “Uranium is So Last Century“, by Richard Martin, published in Wired, December 21, 2009.

Posted in Science | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The Perfect Crime

Diet PepsiPurchase and intentionally age soft drinks before giving them to someone. The drinks will retain their bubble and taste, all the while becoming cerebrally carcinogenic dietary saboteurs.

According to Wikipedia, “[R]esearchers found that 6 months after aspartame was put into carbonated beverages, 25% of the aspartame had been converted to DKP.”1 If this is true, few know that diet soft drinks containing aspertame become toxic after 6 months. Aspartylphenylalanine diketopiperazine as a product of aspartame according to some researchers will produce in the stomach another chemical that causes brain cancer.23 In a letter to the editor of the Journal of Neuropathology & Experimental Neurology, Gary W. Flamm states that the studies done on rats indicating an increased rate of brain tumor used doses hundreds of times what a normal human would ingest,4 but a human that drinks diet soft drinks on a daily basis will ingest that extreme amount in a lifetime.

According to Wikipedia, very few studies have been done on aspartylphenylalanine diketopiperazine’s effect on humans, so the results are still open. It may be possible to poison someone over a long period of time with just diet pepsi.

  1. Wing Sum Tsang, Margaret A. Clarke, and Frederick W. Parrish (1985). “Determination of aspartame and its breakdown products in soft drinks by reverse-phase chromatography with UV detection”. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 33: 734–738. doi:10.1021/jf00064a043. []
  2. Olney JW, Farber NB, Spitznagel E, Robins LN (November 1996). “Increasing brain tumor rates: is there a link to aspartame?”. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 55 (11): 1115–23. doi:10.1097/00005072-199611000-00002PMID 8939194. []
  3. Shephard SE, Wakabayashi K, Nagao M (May 1993). “Mutagenic activity of peptides and the artificial sweetener aspartame after nitrosation”. Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association 31 (5): 323–9. PMID 8505016. []
  4. “Letter to the Editor”, by Gary W. Flamm, published in the Journal of Neuropathology & Experimental Neurology, 1997. [HTML] []
Posted in Science | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

End Airborne Terrorism

When Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab attempted to detonate plastic explosives concealed in his underwear on Northwest Airlines Flight 253, I saw public outcry for greater airport security. People saw yet another terrorist show airport security ineffective. They asked, “How could this have happened?” People paid to make solutions came up with ideas like ramping up airport security, and telling people they could no longer move during the last hour of flight.

Republicans and conservatives argue ardently for gun rights and against regulation and gun-free zones. But when it comes to airplanes, they sit quiet. Arguers for gun rights bring up the fact that every known statistic shows that neighborhoods under stricter gun controls have a higher incidence of violent crime. Criminals don’t mind the law, and know law abiding citizens are helpless. Similarly, terrorists target airplanes because they know that airport security has ensured that the people are absolutely helpless.

The solution to airborne terrorism is to allow individuals with concealed weapons licenses to use their officially licensed privileges and 2nd Amendment right to keep and bear arms. Any individual interested in “causing terror” above American skies will think twice. They will learn that personal freedom makes the American citizen truly courageous and powerful.

Posted in Humanities | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Possible Location for Moonbase Found

Using images from the SELENE craft, Moon researchers have found a giant hole (hundreds of feet wide and hundreds of feet deep) in what they think is a lava tube. The lava tube provides protection from meteorite strikes, cosmic rays, UV radiation, and harsh temperature variations, so it is an excellent candidate for further exploration inhabitance. Although the hole is probably the product of a tube collapse approximately 3.5 billion years ago, today the lava shield does not appear to be prone to collapse.

The findings were published November 12, but they rose to public attention only this week.

NASA is working on plans to return to the moon by 2020 and wants to set up a temporary lunar colony by 2025 as part of the Constellation Program. Funding for the program remains dubious.

Lineage: CNN, ScienceDaily

Posted in Informational, Science | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Institutionalized Conspiracy

CIA logoIn most of its operations, the CIA is by definition a conspiracy, using covert actions and secret plans, many of which are of the most unsavory kind. What are covert operations if not conspiracies? At the same time, the CIA is an institution, a structural part of the national security state. In sum, the agency is an institutionalized conspiracy.

Information Awareness Office Logo

Official seal of the IAO, complete with Masonic eye-in-pyramid blasting a sci-fi death ray across the globe and Latin maxim, "knowledge is power."

But it’s not only the CIA. The Information Awareness Office and Information Exploitation Office were opened in 2001 with former Iran-Contra conspirator and Reagan Security Advisor John Poindexter at the helm. Their stated goal is that of “Total Information Awareness.”1 Although the IAO’s funding was terminated in a motion by Senator Russ Feingold in 2004, their projects were expressly allowed to continue, under a black budget.2 Since then, the Information Exploitation Office has renamed itself the “Information Processing Techniques Office“ and Total Information Awareness has been rechristened “Terrorist Information Awareness.”

But it isn’t only the CIA, IAO, IEO, and TIA. It’s also the NSA & CSSGCHQCSEDSDGCSBFSB, SIS, BND, and ISI. It’s the global ECHELON surveillance network run by the world’s most powerful governments,3 the NarusInsight supercomputing mass surveillance system available for use only by government contract,4 secret patents granted under gag order that never expire,5 and the mysterious radomes that appear on restricted areas on every continent.6

According to Donald Rumsfeld in 2001, the Pentagon “cannot track” $2.3 trillion dollars of its own transactions,7 a number which is 2.5 times larger than that year’s total estimated defense budget8 and 1.5 times larger than 2010’s entire estimated federal budget9.

Suddenly, a global conspiracy isn’t such a crazy idea. In fact, it’s a public institution paid for by your tax dollars.

  1. The original website hosted by DARPA has been destroyed, these are two mirrors. [HTML1] [HTML2] []
  2. “Total/Terrorism Information Awareness (TIA): Is it Truly Dead?”, published by the Electronic Frontier Foundation. [HTML] []
  3. The UK-USA alliance is an intelligence sharing community formed between five English-speaking nations of the 1st world during the Cold War. []
  4. Quoted from Wikipedia’s Narus article: “[Narus] is notable for being the creator of NarusInsight, a supercomputer system which is used by the NSA and other bodies to perform mass surveillance and monitoring of citizens’ and corporations’ Internet communications in real-time, and whose installation in AT&T’s San Francisco Internet backbone gave rise to a 2006 class action lawsuit by the Electronic Frontier Foundation against AT&T, Hepting v. AT&T.” []
  5. Quoted from Wikipedia’s NSA article: “NSA has the ability to file for a patent from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office under gag order. Unlike normal patents, these are not revealed to the public and do not expire. However, if the Patent Office receives an application for an identical patent from a third party, they will reveal NSA’s patent and officially grant it to NSA for the full term on that date.[12] The Wikipedia article gives an example for one of the NSA’s officially published patents. [HTML] Alternatively, cryptome.org hosts a number of leaked NSA documents including those regarding secret patents, such as “Ion trap in a semiconductor chip patent”, granted December 1, 2009. [HTML] []
  6. Radomes are on the front page of the GCSB website.

    GCSB's got balls []

  7. “The War on Waste”, published by CBS Evening News. [HTML] [VIDEO] []
  8. According to page 4 of the National Defense Budget Estimates for FY 2001, published by Office of the Comptroller of Defense in 2000 [PDF], total obligational authority + total budget authority + total outlays equals approximately $888 billion. 2.3/0.888 equals 2.59 []
  9. “Death and Taxes”, by Jess Bachman. [JPG] []
Posted in Humanities | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

NASA Every Week

Ares I rocket

Ares I rocket

NASA could open up a new wave of innovation in space exploration and terrestrial technology by lessening consequences of launch failure and making frequent launches available to engineers. If there were weekly rocket launches, there would be an astronaumical increase in opportunities for new communication, remote sensing, orbital debris mitigation, robotic exploration, photographic, and human spaceflight technology ideas to be tested. Our understanding of chemical rocketry and other, more advanced forms of aeronautic propulsion would inevitably advance and the United States government would do something inspiring for is citizens and for all the future.

I can see it now: medium-sized modern, economical workhorse rockets launching payloads three times a month, and making the once-impossible absolutely routine. After that, we’d have clusters of nanorockets flying up small probes and experiments every week. Each flavor of nanorocket would be optimized for the delivery of its own type of payload.

Weave the private sector into it! The R&D departments of Blue Chip companies, materials manufacturers, and aeronautic corporations should have stakes in every launch. Top-tier universities would have access for graduate projects and special engineering and computer science teams would be organized by NASA to help translate those project ideas into reality. Any projects that could yield results for commercial manned space travel would have top priority. Private interest will line up as soon as these weekly spots open up. NASA needs to both be a government sponsored organization, and be something valuable to business and a means of research production.

Sending tiny robots into space is not interesting to most people, but it is a fallacy to believe the road to innovation is paved by public excitement. It has never been important for citizens at large to be interested in a scientific field for research to commence; the only thing that is important is the amount of opportunity available for leaps made by single interests. A second reason why public interest does not matter is because the United States is not a democracy, funding is not dictated by citizens at large, but by the opinion of a few high-ranking individuals. Because space is not a hot button issue like socialized care, workers unions, immigration, or religion, politicians are rarely put into office based on their opinions on how funding should be delegated for space research and both major political parties in support of NASA.

Cruise ships depart from US ports daily, airliners depart every second, rail cars by the thousands are in motion, and automobiles even more so. Space travel and access to the next frontier must be made routine. By stepping up the launch rate and shaking hands with private interests, NASA can launch us into the next wave of scientific growth and technological innovation.

Lineage:  Slashdot <- NYT.

Posted in Science | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Sanctioning Iran

My dick is THIS long

Last week, the US House of Representatives overwhelmingly approved a measure to put a new round of sanctions on Iran, the Iran Refined Petroleum Sanctions Act of 2009. Not only are sanctions an offensive maneuver perceived as a precursor to war, but it is clear that the United States is not promoting freedom and peace in the Middle East, because any arguments for sanctions against Iran depend on the destruction of liberty.

People say Iran can’t have the bomb because of what they might do with it. Until an individual actually commits some form of aggression against another human being it is no one’s right to infringe upon another’s right to keep and bear arms. This principle applies as equally to nations as it does to individual people, so in other words, we can’t use government force against people because of “what they might do.”

Some call Iran a “rogue nation” and they can’t be trusted. This is nothing more than a disgusting cultural bias which is flatly refuted by objective reality. In the past 50 years, Iran has never invaded another country or initiated military force against anyone. Beyond the 1979 hostage crisis, they have burned a few U.S. flags and said some very nasty things about the US and Israel. Other than that, they have been content to screw up their own country and leave the rest of the world alone. In contrast, the United States has invaded countless nations. The United States has committed direct acts of war against Iran, including overthrowing their democratically-elected government and appointing their own rulers. The United States has secret prisons all over the world, military bases in 147 countries1, and while the President decries waterboarding and torture, he publicly supports extraordinary rendition2 with expansions occurring  under his leadership3. Who’s the rogue nation now?

Iran lives in a world in which many of its neighbors possess nuclear weapons. In the event of a nuclear attack against Iran, there is nothing the “international community” can do until it is too late, just as there is nothing the police can do for an individual at the moment he is attacked by an aggressor. Like any potential mugging victim, Iran is much safer armed with a deterrent than at the mercy of those who wish Iran harm.

Ron Paul writing in the Times Gazette also brings up the issue of international respect:

…[B]eing surrounded by nuclear powers one can understand why they might want to become nuclear capable if only to defend themselves and to be treated more respectfully. After all, we don’t sanction nuclear capable countries. We take diplomatic negotiations a lot more seriously, and we frequently send money to them instead. The non-nuclear countries are the ones we bomb.4

The people of Iran as a sovereign nation have all of the same rights that the people of the United States do. It is not for the United States to decide what weapons Iran possesses any more than it is Iran’s place to decide what weapons the United States possesses. One would have to employ the most convoluted logic imaginable to arrive at any other conclusion. It is time to stop playing emperor with Iran and start practicing what we preach. We cannot in any way deny Iran the right to bear arms.

Lineage: Campaign for Liberty

  1. Department of Defense. “Active Duty Military Personnel Strengths by Regional Area and by Country”. December 31, 2008. [PDF] []
  2. “U.S. Says Rendition to Continue, but With More Oversight”, by David Johnston, published in the New York Times on August 24, 2009. [HTML] []
  3. “Renditioning Under Obama”, by Anthony Gregory, published on the Campaign for Liberty blog on August 24, 2009. [HTML] []
  4. “Iran Sanctions are a Precursor to War”, by Ron Paul, on December 28, 2009 in the Times Gazette. [HTML] []
Posted in Humanities | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Citrus History

Orange photo
Oranges are often said to be a wholesome, natural, and tasty thing to eat. But just what is “natural?” The history of the orange and it’s acidic friends is a scientific adventure through prehistoric genetic engineering and cultural trade.

It is commonly accepted that there are four founding species of the citrus genus:

  • Lime (Citrus aurantifolia)
  • Pummelo (Citrus maxima)
  • Citron (Citrus medica)
  • Mandarin (Citrus reticulata)

The citron was the first of the citruses to be known in Europe. Having been introduced to Europe by Alexander the Great’s armies, it was used first as a perfume and then as a food. The lime was introduced to Europe during the crusades. The pummelo was introduced at about the same time, and the mandarin was last to be introduced to Europe, in the 19th century.

These fruits were commercially grown in China for thousands of years, then introduced to Europe through trade. But three of the most popular citrus plants today are all plants that were invented by humans through hybridization:

  • Lemon, Citrus limon (citron × lime, invented in India)
  • Grapefruit, Citrus paradisii (pummelo × orange, invented in Barbados)
  • Orange, Citrus sinensis (pummelo × mandarin, invented somewhere in Southeast Asia)

Portuguese, Spanish, Arab, and Dutch sailors planted lemon trees along trade routes to prevent scurvy. On his second voyage in 1493, Christopher Columbus brought the seeds of oranges, lemons and citrons to Haiti and the Caribbean. Oranges and lemons were introduced to Florida in 1513 by Juan Ponce de Leon, and were introduced to Hawaii in 1792.

Barbados map

Island of Barbados

In the early 1700s Captain Shaddock invented the grapefruit on the island of Barbados by mixing the Jamaican sweet orange with the Indonesian pomelo plant. The “Shaddock” over time became the “grapefruit,” an allusion to the clusters of fruit on the tree, which often appear similar to grapes. In 1929 the red grapefruit was invented after a single red grapefruit was found growing on a pink variety tree. Over time this variety was bred into commonality and patented.

Conjoined twins

The conjoined twin of the navel orange, seen bottom right.

But by far the most interesting story of human invention regarding the citrus is the story of the navel orange. Navel oranges are one of the most common and easily recognizable types of fruit, due to the fact that it is actually two oranges living in one shell. Every navel orange contains a conjoined twin inside it. The bump created by this conjoined twin bears resemblance to a human navel.

From a single mutation in 1820 in an orchard of sweet oranges planted at a monastery in Brazil came the navel orange. Every navel orange plant in existence today has been genetically cloned from the original 19th century tree.

Because the delicious and interesting mutation left the fruit seedless, and therefore sterile, the only means available to cultivate this variety is to graft cuttings onto other varieties of citrus tree. Grafting is the process of cutting part of a living organism off and transplanting it to the open wound of another organism, fusing them together. Two cuttings of the original tree were transplanted by ship to Riverside, California in 1870.

Today, navel oranges continue to be produced via cutting and grafting. Every navel orange has exactly the same genetic makeup as the original two hundred-year-old tree. They are clones, and in essence are all the fruit of a single tree. When you bite into a fresh navel orange, grapefruit, lemon, or even if you are fortunate enough to be eating a lime outside of China, realize that you are eating something entirely of human invention.

Lineage:

Posted in Humanities, Science | Tagged , , , , | 2 Comments

Pleasing Everybody

I was just reading the GNOME Human Interface Guidelines, which tell computer application developers how to make their applications integrate well into GNOME, and the internationalization section closes with a list of some common things to avoid:

  • Pictures of flags or money
  • Maps showing political boundaries or contentious location names
  • Lists of countries or cities in non-alphabetical order (unless specifically requested or required by the context)
  • Icons depicting animals
  • Icons depicting only hands or feet

Alright, I get it— somebody from New Guinea may not be familiar with an animal that an application developer on the other side of the world sees every day, right? But hands and feet? Are you kidding me!? Most of us are BORN with hands and feet, so not understanding what a foot is could be a problem. It would have to be something offensive or impolite.

As I understand it, Islam forbids any iconography (especially of Mohammed), which is why traditional Muslim art and architecture is characterized by intricate geometric designs and scrolls.

You really can’t get less iconographic or symbolic than Libya’s flag:

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/05/Flag_of_Libya.svg/800px-Flag_of_Libya.svg.png

That would account for the avoidance of animal icons, as well as against the hands and feet. Some Arabs can be offended by body language involving hands and feet. For instance, it is considered impolite to point the sole of your foot or shoe at another person. So just to be on the safe side, it might be best to avoid any depictions of hands or feet.

Place irony here.

Oh, the irony.

I suppose using a penis as a symbol for a function on the computer to “make new things” would not be acceptable in Western culture (it would be perfectly acceptable in others), but O Allah!, why should some gesture or even body part be insufferable to one race, and acceptable to another? Are we, as the humans, that narrow minded? And we are letting something as petty as this influence the way we build computer systems? If we cannot look at a picture of a foot, or any other body part for that matter, how will we ever communicate as humans without hostility?

LineagePF

Posted in Humanities | Tagged , , | Leave a comment